On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:57:32 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 11:12 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > I'm not comfortable with this. SMT may only be used for pseries at > > the moment, but the SMT possibilities are absolutely a constraint of > > the CPU itself, not the machine type. It seems more logical to me to > > check this in the CPU code. > > Also powernv uses them too no ? > > Ben. > Hi Ben ! I've started to play with Cedric's tree on github. I'll work on adapting powernv to this series. Cheers. -- Greg
