Am 08.07.2016 um 00:45 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 07/07/2016 06:11 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > In order to remove the necessity to use BlockBackend names in the > > external API, we want to allow node-names everywhere. This converts > > block-stream to accept a node-name without lifting the restriction that > > we're operating at a root node. > > > > In case of an invalid device name, the command returns the GenericError > > error class now instead of DeviceNotFound, because this is what > > qmp_get_root_bs() returns. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > > --- > > blockdev.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > qapi/block-core.json | 5 +---- > > qmp-commands.hx | 2 +- > > tests/qemu-iotests/030 | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > The interface change looks okay; but due to Berto's comments, I'm not > sure it is worth giving R-b yet if you plan on changing the check for > whether a node name properly qualifies as a root name.
Initially I intended to address the comment with some change, but since I realised that you already can put a BB everywhere and therefore this doesn't protect anything against intentional actions anyway, I'm not so sure any more. Do you have an opintion on this? More input would be appreciated. Kevin
pgpUj6h0u8REk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
