On 07/11/2016 09:51 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 07/11/2016 09:04 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >> On 10/07/16 23:14, Cédric Le Goater wrote: >> >>> Mark, >>> >>> For OS 9, do you plan to commit these openbios patches soon ? >>> >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg02824.html >>> >>> as we just gave them a good test. Or may be, include them under >>> a github branch to make them easier to find. >> >> All of the OS 9 patches for QEMU and OpenBIOS have been upstreamed, >> except this one for OpenBIOS: >> https://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/openbios/2015-June/008722.html. I >> currently keep a manually build binary at >> https://www.ilande.co.uk/tmp/openbios/openbios-ppc for people who can't >> build their own. >> >>> Also, I found out that some OS 9 isos are not supported by qemu. >>> These are ok : >>> >>> >>> http://www.emaculation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=7047&sid=0ef8922b24a51d2a9d546300aea69c64&start=250 >>> >>> But the one under : >>> >>> http://c-obrien.org/qemu-os9/testing/ >>> >>> does not boot. It loops on some CUDA commands and then hangs. >>> I did not dig further. Is that a known issue ? >> >> Hmmm if that's the same 9.2.1 image we were using for last year's GSoC >> then it has been working fine here? From what I've seen both 9.2.1 and >> 9.2.2 now boot fine, but please test and report if that's not the case. > > Hello Mark, > > I managed to boot and install a 9.2.1. Here is what I have used for > that : > > * qemu, David's 2.7 branch, plus Ben's patch "v2 ppc: Fix support > for odd MSR combinations". > > * openbios, github's HEAD + the patch your patch from : > > https://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/openbios/2015-June/008722.html > > * iso, the os9.osi from > > http://c-obrien.org/qemu-os9/testing/
That is a 9.2.1. Status is the same with a 9.2.2 I found on the net. Cheers, C. > There are a couple of qemu errors : > > dbdma_unassigned_rw: use of unassigned channel 14 > dbdma_unassigned_flush: use of unassigned channel 14 > CUDA: unknown command 0x24 > > and invalids read/write on SPRs but it didn't cause any issue in the guest > at installation time or later at runtime. I did not try network though. > > So mainline only misses your forth patch. Looking really good ! > > Thanks, > > C. >
