On 7 July 2016 at 14:04, Krzeminski, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Cédric Le Goater [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On 07/06/2016 02:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> > break; >> > case MAN_SPANSION: >> > s->needed_bytes += >> SPANSION_CONTINUOUS_READ_MODE_CMD_LEN; >> > @@ -814,7 +815,8 @@ static void decode_qio_read_cmd(Flash *s) >> > /* Dummy cycles modeled with bytes writes instead of bits */ >> > switch (get_man(s)) { >> > case MAN_WINBOND: >> > - s->needed_bytes += 8; >> > + s->needed_bytes += >> WINBOND_CONTINUOUS_READ_MODE_CMD_LEN; >> > + s->needed_bytes += 4; >> >> but I don't understand the above. I see the address + M7-0 + 2 dummies. >> > Hello Cedric, > > This is because the problematic interface in here. Generally you need > to send 2 dummy bytes, but this is four clocks in this mode (Fig 24a). > I want to send a proposal to change this dummy clock interface > after 2.7 will be released, because now it is really confusing and unclear. Cedric, could you let me know if you're happy with this patch now? If you are you can provide a reviewed-by tag and I can apply it to target-arm.next... thanks -- PMM
