On 12/07/16 15:26, David Gibson wrote:
> This ioctl() call to VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_REMOVE was left over from an
> earlier version of the code and has since been folded into
> vfio_spapr_remove_window().
> 
> It wasn't caught because although the argument structure has been removed,
> the libc function remove() means this didn't trigger a compile failure.
> The ioctl() was also almost certain to fail silently and harmlessly with
> the bogus argument, so this wasn't caught in testing.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[email protected]>



Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email protected]>



> ---
>  hw/vfio/spapr.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Alexey, I've already put this tentatively into ppc-for-2.7, but I'd
> appreciate an ack before I send my next pull request.
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/spapr.c b/hw/vfio/spapr.c
> index 0af3423..7443d34 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/spapr.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ int vfio_spapr_create_window(VFIOContainer *container,
>          error_report("Host doesn't support DMA window at %"HWADDR_PRIx", 
> must be %"PRIx64,
>                       section->offset_within_address_space,
>                       (uint64_t)create.start_addr);
> -        ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_REMOVE, &remove);
>          return -EINVAL;
>      }
>      trace_vfio_spapr_create_window(create.page_shift,
> 


-- 
Alexey

Reply via email to