David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 02:14:38PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: >> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> [ rebased and added POWER9 alias and POWER9 SPAPR core ] >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > I can't really review this until the series is a bit more polished and > we have a better idea how the handling of the POWER9 MMU is going to > work. As it stands, this sets the P9 MMU type to something that only > makes sense in guest context, not host context.
Will send a patch without P9 MMU changes and have a FIXME to add it. Regards Nikunj
