On 07/27/10 02:13, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 18:28 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 07/26/2010 05:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 07/26/2010 04:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >>> - 0.13 update >>> I'll pre-empt the 0.13 question with an answer. I'm just testing >>> the VNC changes and if all goes well, I'll tag tonight. >>> >>> Initial thinking is to keep 0.14 short and target Dec 1st. >>> >>> - if danpb can make it, would like to discuss -help output parsing >>> summary: help parsing is terrible, but given the fact that >>> capabilities is going to take a while to get totally right, would like >>> to discuss an interim solution that gives us more flexibility to do >>> reasonable things with the help output. >> >> - any additional input on probed_raw? > > - cpu model #s, does anyone know things that would break if we bumped > the qemu64 model up to 13 (or higher?) and made definitions for > Conroe/Penryn/Nehalem use more representative model #s?
That was my topic for the call :) The currenct qemu64 cpu model is a mess, family 6, model 2 is not even a 64 bit processor, plus we enable a bunch of flags that didn't exist in those processors: pni, popcnt, cx16, sse4a, lm, nx, lahf_lm, svm, abm (if I got the list right). Jes
