On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:17:27PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> The test case overwrites the Coroutine object with 0xff as a way to
> assert that the coroutine isn't used any more. However, this means that
> the coroutine pool now contains a corrupted object and later test cases
> may get this corrupted object and crash.
> 
> This patch saves the real content of the object and restores it after
> completing the test. The only use of the coroutine pool between those
> two points is the deletion of co2. As this only means an insertion at
> the head of an SLIST (release_pool or alloc_pool), it doesn't access the
> invalid list pointers that co1 has during this period.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/test-coroutine.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

It's a really invasive test that has given us trouble before, but it
does test something useful...

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to