On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:56:38AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Regarding Patch 2/2: > > This patch seems to filter responses from set_mem_table only for certain > > updates of memory regions. It violates the definition of the REPLY_ACK > > feature. This feature expects the client to send a response for every call > > of set_mem_table. And here, qemu exits the set_mem_table() function in some > > cases without even waiting for the reply that is going to come in. > > > > Agreed with Prerna here, > > Furthermore, I haven't followed closely the recents developments, and the > commit message doesn't explain why it should not be necessary to sync the > first time set-mem-table is called. Could you develop that? > > thanks
Basically if we send set mem table when backend is not started, there is no reason to wait for a response. -- MST