On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 09:51 -0400, G 3 wrote: > > > Is it worth renaming this to make it obvious that it is your > > (non-optimal) replacement, intentionally because you don't want to > > use > > the libc version? > > I originally thought about adding a prefix to all my functions. Ben > what do you think? > I'm ok with either way.
DriverServicesLibrary has: char *CStrCopy(char *dst, const char *src); char *CStrNCopy (char *dst, const char *src, UInt32 max); char *CStrCat (char *dst, const char *src); char *CStrNCat (char *dst, const char *src, UInt32 max); short CStrCmp (const char *str1, const char *str2); short CStrNCmp (const char *str1, const char *str2, UInt32 max); UInt32 CStrLen (const char *src); Cheers, Ben.
