On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:05:47PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 11:51 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Ok, as noted elsewhere, I think you need to disassociate the PIR value
> > from the cpu_index.  It may be a little less elegant, but it'll make
> > your life much easier in the short and medium term.
> > 
> > Apart from that, this looks pretty good, though I have one suggested
> > cleanup below.
> As long as the PIR value is what is used everywhere, ie, interrupt
> controller, XSCOM addressing of the cores, Doorbells, etc...

Right, obviously the physical ID needs to be used for all the guest
visible interfaces.

David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to