On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:50:49AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:29:26 +1000
> David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Now that we allow CPU hot unplug on a few platforms, we can end up in a
> > situation where we don't have a CPU with index 0.  Or at least we could,
> > if we didn't have code to explicitly prohibit unplug of CPU 0.
> > 
> > Longer term we want to allow CPU 0 unplug, this patch is an early step in
> > allowing this, by removing an assumption in the monitor code that CPU 0
> > always exists.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: C├ędric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org>
> > [dwg: Rewrote commit message to better explain background]
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  monitor.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Anyone want to volunteer to take this through their tree?  If not, I
> > can take it through my ppc tree.
> 
> Please do.

Ok, merged to ppc-for-2.8.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com>
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > index 8bb8bbf..83c4edf 100644
> > --- a/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor.c
> > @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ int monitor_set_cpu(int cpu_index)
> >  CPUState *mon_get_cpu(void)
> >  {
> >      if (!cur_mon->mon_cpu) {
> > -        monitor_set_cpu(0);
> > +        monitor_set_cpu(first_cpu->cpu_index);
> >      }
> >      cpu_synchronize_state(cur_mon->mon_cpu);
> >      return cur_mon->mon_cpu;
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to