We're going to change the way level/xlevel/xlevel2 are handled
when enabling features, but we need to keep the old behavior on
existing machine types. Add test cases for that.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
* Coding style changes (split long lines)
---
 tests/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c b/tests/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c
index b81cfeb..f7003ee 100644
--- a/tests/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c
+++ b/tests/test-x86-cpuid-compat.c
@@ -104,5 +104,18 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
                    "-cpu 486,xlevel2=0xC0000002,+xstore",
                    "xlevel2", 0xC0000002);
 
+    /* Check compatibility of old machine-types that didn't
+     * auto-increase level/xlevel/xlevel2: */
+
+    add_cpuid_test("x86/cpuid/auto-level/pc-2.7",
+                   "-machine pc-i440fx-2.7 -cpu 
486,+arat,+avx512vbmi,+xsaveopt",
+                   "level", 1);
+    add_cpuid_test("x86/cpuid/auto-xlevel/pc-2.7",
+                   "-machine pc-i440fx-2.7 -cpu 
486,+3dnow,+sse4a,+invtsc,+npt",
+                   "xlevel", 0);
+    add_cpuid_test("x86/cpuid/auto-xlevel2/pc-2.7",
+                   "-machine pc-i440fx-2.7 -cpu 486,+xstore",
+                   "xlevel2", 0);
+
     return g_test_run();
 }
-- 
2.7.4


Reply via email to