On 09/28/2016 08:41 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
Without patch:
==============
[tcg_test]$ time ../qemu/ppc64le-linux-user/qemu-ppc64le  -cpu POWER9 le_lxvw4x  
>/dev/null
real    0m2.812s
user    0m2.792s
sys     0m0.020s
[tcg_test]$

With patch:
===========
[tcg_test]$ time ../qemu/ppc64le-linux-user/qemu-ppc64le  -cpu POWER9 le_lxvw4x  
>/dev/null
real    0m2.801s
user    0m2.783s
sys     0m0.018s
[tcg_test]$

Not much perceivable difference, is there a better way to benchmark?

There should be more of a difference for softmmu, since the tlb lookup for the memory is more expensive.


r~


Reply via email to