On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote: > object_new_with_object_class() was a close contender for the name, but > it is longer, the type system will catch possible errors, and the only > reasonable replacement would be a polymorphic function that would not > break existing users. > > Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> -- Eduardo
