On 10/10/2016 04:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.

It looks like this is a respin because it was removed from an earlier
pull request; now that the previous patches mentioned have landed and
this is no longer immediately adjacent to those patches, is it worth
tweaking the commit message to call out commit ids?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> Message-Id: <20160922203927.28241-4-marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> [Rename tests/test-qemu-qmp.c to tests/qmp-test.c, cover it in
> MAINTAINERS, add a file comment]
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>

Since you reworked the patch to get it to compile, you may want to drop
the [] parenthetical inserted by Markus, as this is now a new revision
of your patch (although crediting him for contributions is still
appropriate).

> +++ b/tests/qmp-test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +/*
> + * QTest testcase for QMP
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2016 Red Hat, Inc.

We aren't very consistent on (C) vs. (c). I don't know if a lawyer would
complain.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to