On 10/11/2016 09:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Should we introduce a new, clean blockdev-stream command that fixes this > and matches the common name pattern? Of course, block-stream vs. > blockdev-stream could be a bit confusing, too... >
A new command is easy to introspect (query-commands), lets us get rid of cruft, and makes it obvious that we support everything from the get-go. I'm favoring that option, even if it leads to slightly confusing names of the deprecated vs. the new command. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
