On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 11.10.2016 um 09:37 hat Ashijeet Acharya geschrieben:
>> This series adds blockdev-add support for SSH block driver.
>> Patch 1 prepares the code for the addition of a new option prefix,
>> which is "server.". This is accomplished by adding a
>> ssh_has_filename_options_conflict() function which helps to iterate
>> over the various options and check for conflict.
>> Patch 2 first adds InetSocketAddress compatibility to SSH block driver
>> and then makes it accept a InetSocketAddress under the "server" option.
>> The old options "host" and "port" are supported as legacy options and
>> then translated to the respective InetSocketAddress representation.
>> Patch 3 drops the usage of "host" and "port" outside of
>> ssh_has_filename_options_conflict() and
>> ssh_process_legacy_socket_options() functions in order to make them
>> legacy options completely.
>> Patch 4 helps to allow blockdev-add support for the SSH block driver
>> by making the SSH option available.
> Commented on patch 2, the rest looks good to me at first sight.
Yes, I am going through that currently and will ask you if I have any queries.
> Just curious, what kind of testing did you give the series?
First thing I made sure if I wasn't breaking anything. Basically I
checked if blockdev-add worked with it and then if I am able to remove
it with x-blockdev-del. Also, there were no major changes which could
make the patches to break. I don't see tests available for SSH either
so there was nothing much I can do.
Do you have anything in mind?