On 13/10/2016 12:48, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> > 
> I'm fine with this. I just think, it would be nice if the contract between
> the vmstate-core and the client code implementing VMStateInfo callbacks
> could be documented, including when are certain parameters valid, what
> they stand for, and how are they supposed to be used for the next version of
> the patch. Just to improve readability. Would this be OK with everybody?
> By the way the flag VMS_SINGLE is documented as ignored. Should we drop
> it?

Yes, I think so.


Reply via email to