On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:24:44PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> We have now the cpu_exec_realize() in realize,
> so the init part must be in init.
> I've removed the cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet field as
> unsafe references have been moved to cpu_exec_realize().
> (tested with QOM command provided by commit 4c315c27 with
> "athlon-x86_64-cpu")
> CC: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>

Resending the question I asked in my reply to v1:

Instead of creating requiring each subclass to manually call
cpu_exec_init()) on instance_init, why don't we move parts of
cpu_exec_init()/cpu_exec_realize() code to cpu_common_initfn()?
(TYPE_CPU's instance_init)

(And if there's any code that needs to be run after the
subclasses instance_init functions, we can just add a
instance_post_init function to TYPE_CPU).


Reply via email to