Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21)
> On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular
> > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for
> > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's a bit
> > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging
> > format they want for a particular tree.
> Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not
> very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support
> multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but
> it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body".
> People who actively want to look for stuff not to go
> into master can filter it however they like.
Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be
prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though.
I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something
> -- PMM