Quoting Peter Maydell (2016-10-17 13:45:21) > On 17 October 2016 at 19:13, Michael Roth <mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > We could do both though: use some ad-hoc way to tag for a particular > > sub-maintainer tree/stable branch, as well as an explicit "not for > > master" in the cover letter ensure it doesn't go into master. It's a bit > > more redundant, but flexible in that people can use whatever tagging > > format they want for a particular tree. > > Yes, that would be my preference. Gmail's filtering is not > very good, and it doesn't seem to be able to support > multiple or complex matches on the subject line, but > it can deal with "doesn't include foo in body". > People who actively want to look for stuff not to go > into master can filter it however they like.
Sounds good to me. For my part I think "for-2.7.1" etc. would be prefereable. No need to resend this patchset though. I suppose MAINTAINERS would be the best place to document something like this? > > thanks > -- PMM >