On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> wrote:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 21:34 schrieb Ashijeet Acharya:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/17/2016 01:00 PM, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
>>>
>>>> One more relatively easy question though, will we include @port as an
>>>> option in runtime_opts while converting NFS to use several
>>>> runtime_opts? The reason I ask this because the uri syntax for NFS in
>>>> QEMU looks like this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nfs://<host>/<export>/<filename>[?param=value[&param2=value2[&...]]]
>>>
>>> It's actually nfs://<host>[:port]/...
>>>
>>> so the URI syntax already supports port.
>>
>> But the commit message which added support for NFS had the uri which I
>> mentioned above and the code for NFS does not make use of 'port'
>> anywhere either, which is why I am a bit confused.
>
>
> Hi Aschijeet,
>
> don't worry there is no port number when connecting to an NFS server.
> The portmapper always listens on port 111. So theoretically we could
> specifiy a port in the URL but it is ignored.

So that means I will be including 'port' in runtime_opts and then just
ignoring any value that comes through it?

Ashijeet
>
> BR,
> Peter

Reply via email to