On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 07:46:00PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > If given an option string such as
> >
> > size=1024,nodes=10,nodes=4-5,nodes=1-2,policy=bind
> >
> > the qemu_opts_to_qdict() method will currently overwrite
> > the values for repeated option keys, so only the last
> > value is in the returned dict:
> >
> > size=QString("1024")
> > nodes=QString("1-2")
> > policy=QString("bind")
> >
> > With this change the caller can optionally ask for all
> > the repeated values to be stored in a QList. In the
> > above example that would result in 'nodes' being a
> > QList, so the returned dict would contain
> >
> > size=QString("1024")
> > nodes=QList([QString("10"),
> > QString("4-5"),
> > QString("1-2")])
> > policy=QString("bind")
> >
> > Note that the conversion has no way of knowing whether
> > any given key is expected to be a list upfront - it can
> > only figure that out when seeing the first duplicated
> > key. Thus the caller has to be prepared to deal with the
> > fact that if a key 'foo' is a list, then the returned
> > qdict may contain either a QString or a QList for the
> > key 'foo'.
> >
> > In a third mode, it is possible to ask for repeated
> > options to be reported as an error, rather than silently
> > dropping all but the last one.
>
> To serve as a replacement for the options visitor, this needs to be able
> to behave exactly the same together with a suitably hacked up QObject
> input visitor. Before I dive into the actual patch, let me summarize
> QemuOpts and options visitor behavior.
>
> Warning, this is going to get ugly.
>
> QemuOpts faithfully represents a key=value,... string as a list of
> QemuOpt. Each QemuOpt represents one key=value. They are in the same
> order. If key occurs multiple times in the string, it occurs just the
> same in the list.
>
> *Except* key "id" is special: it's stored outside the list, and all but
> the first one are silently ignored.
>
> Most users only ever get the last value of a key. Any non-last
> key=value are silently ignored.
>
> We actually exploit this behavior to do defaults, by *prepending* them
> to the list. See the use of qemu_opts_set_defaults() in main().
>
> A few users get all values of keys (other than key "id"):
>
> * -device, in qdev_device_add() with callback set_property().
>
> We first get "driver" and "bus" normally (silently ignoring non-last
> values, as usual). All other keys are device properties. To set
> them, we get all (key, value), ignore keys "driver" and "bus", and set
> the rest. If a key occurs multiple times, it gets set multiple times.
> This effectively ignores all but the last one, silently.
>
> * -semihosting-config, in main() with callback add_semihosting_arg().
>
> We first get a bunch of keys normally. Key "arg" is special: it may
> be repeated to build a list. To implement that, we get all (key,
> value), ignore keys other than "arg", and accumulate the values.
>
> * -machine & friends, in main() with callback machine_set_property()
>
> Similar to -device, only for machines, with "type" instead of "driver"
> and "bus".
>
> * -spice, in qemu_spice_init() with callback add_channel()
>
> Keys "tls-channel" and "plaintext-channel" may be used repeated to
> specify multiple channels. To implement that, we get all (key,
> value), ignore keys other than "tls-channel" and "plaintext-channel",
> and set up a channel for each of the others.
>
> * -writeconfig, in config_write_opts() with callback config_write_opt()
>
> We write out all keys in order.
>
> * The options visitor, in opts_start_struct()
>
> We convert the list of (key, value) to a hash table of (key, list of
> values). Most of the time, the list of values has exactly one
> element.
>
> When the visitor's user asks for a scalar, we return the last element
> of the list of values, in lookup_scalar().
>
> When the user asks for list elements, we return the elements of the
> list of values in order, in opts_next_list(), or if there are none,
> the empty list in opts_start_list().
>
> Unlike the options visitor, this patch (judging from your description)
> makes a list only when keys are repeated. The QObject visitor will have
> to cope with finding both scalars and lists. When it finds a scalar,
> but needs a list, it'll have to wrap it in a list (PATCH 09, I think).
> When it finds a list, but needs a scalar, it'll have to fish it out of
> the list (where is that?).
If my code finds a list but wants a scalar, it is reporting an
error.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
