+ Venky Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Ketan Nilangekar <ketan.nilange...@veritas.com> > wrote: > > We are able to derive significant performance from the qemu block driver as > compared to nbd/iscsi/nfs. We have prototyped nfs and nbd based io tap in the > past and the performance of qemu block driver is significantly better. Hence > we would like to go with the vxhs driver for now. > > Ketan > > >> On Oct 24, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 20/10/2016 03:31, Ketan Nilangekar wrote: >>> This way the failover logic will be completely out of qemu address >>> space. We are considering use of some of our proprietary >>> clustering/monitoring services to implement service failover. >> >> Are you implementing a different protocol just for the sake of QEMU, in >> other words, and forwarding from that protocol to your proprietary code? >> >> If that is what you are doing, you don't need at all a vxhs driver in >> QEMU. Just implement NBD or iSCSI on your side, QEMU already has >> drivers for that. >> >> Paolo
