On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:30:19 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The object_property_add_bool() call in dummy_init() is always
> failing because there is an existing "bv" class property. We need
> to remove either the "bv" class property or the "bv" instance
> property.
>
> Remove the class property so both object properties and class
> properties are covered by the test code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes series v2 -> v3:
> * Reworded commit message for clarity
> ---
> tests/check-qom-proplist.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/check-qom-proplist.c b/tests/check-qom-proplist.c
> index a16cefc..693dc4c 100644
> --- a/tests/check-qom-proplist.c
> +++ b/tests/check-qom-proplist.c
> @@ -129,10 +129,6 @@ static void dummy_init(Object *obj)
>
> static void dummy_class_init(ObjectClass *cls, void *data)
> {
> - object_class_property_add_bool(cls, "bv",
> - dummy_get_bv,
> - dummy_set_bv,
> - NULL);
> object_class_property_add_str(cls, "sv",
> dummy_get_sv,
> dummy_set_sv,
