On 29/11/2016 16:24, Andrew Jones wrote: > While we have a ppoll audience, another issue with the current polling > is that we can block with an infinite timeout set (-1), and it can > actually end up being infinite, i.e. vcpus will never run again. I'm > able to exhibit this with kvm-unit-tests.
This should only happen outside the big QEMU lock, otherwise it's a bug. Paolo > For these rare cases where > no other timeout has been selected, shouldn't we have a default timeout? > Anyone want to pick a number? I have a baseless compulsion to use 10 ms...