On 16 December 2016 at 11:49, Alvise Rigo <a.r...@virtualopensystems.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> The hardest part is making sure that it doesn't bitrot, and it's hard >> because we don't have CI for architectures other than x86. But at least >> Peter builds on ARM, and target submaintainers do build on PPC and s390 >> so it's not that bad perhaps. > > Would a CI set up just to test this feature make sense?
If we had CI for multiple host architectures we'd just use it routinely for everything. The difficulty is that there's nothing public like Travis for non-x86 and historically we as a project have not managed to maintain a local CI solution (we used to have buildbots but their config just bitrotted). We do include ARM and PPC in the standard set of build tests before merging pull requests, though, so those are not completely untested. thanks -- PMM
