On 22/12/2016 18:30, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 22 December 2016 at 15:59, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> This moves out of libqemustub.a those functions which can be handled >> simply by $(call lnot), like we already do for pci-stub.c or kvm-stub.c. >> libqemustub.a keep the more complex cases where a small part of the >> executables we build needs an implementation of a small subset of an API. > > So why is doing it this way round better? (I don't have a strong > opinion here, but you don't really give a rationale for this change.)
I don't really have a strong opinion here either, hence the RFC. However, one advantage is that it keeps things visible to the right maintainer. Paolo
