On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:34:20AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Mon, 01/09 17:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 9 January 2017 at 16:48, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > The strange thing here is that this actually seems to apply patches > > > from list instead of getting the tag from the tree. > > > > That's because it's really supposed to be working on patches sent > > to the list -- it only checks pull requests because it can't > > tell them apart from patches, I think. > > It can be taught not to check pull requests but I don't see a reason to, maybe > it's better to let patchew pull the tag instead of applying, but on the other > hand it's a bit odd to assume they two differ, that's why I haven't done it. > > Fam
Well it's definitely better to actually test the pull req as it is and not test patches applied at a random master.
