On 10.01.2017 04:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> There are only very old and orphaned stable branches listed
>> in the MAINTAINERS file - so this section is pretty useless
>> nowadays. Let's remove it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> 
> 
> Could you add some kind of entry for stable though?
> Otherwise people won't know which address to CC.

I think that's a question to Michael Roth - whether such an entry should
be added and how it should look like.

 Thomas


>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 22 ----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index d8575ab..4a60579 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1574,28 +1574,6 @@ F: tcg/tci/
>>  F: tci.c
>>  F: disas/tci.c
>>  
>> -Stable branches
>> ----------------
>> -Stable 1.0
>> -L: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-1.0.git
>> -S: Orphan
>> -
>> -Stable 0.15
>> -L: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-0.15.git
>> -S: Orphan
>> -
>> -Stable 0.14
>> -L: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-0.14.git
>> -S: Orphan
>> -
>> -Stable 0.10
>> -L: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
>> -T: git git://git.qemu-project.org/qemu-stable-0.10.git
>> -S: Orphan
>> -
>>  Block drivers
>>  -------------
>>  VMDK
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>


Reply via email to