On Mon, 01/16 13:24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/01/2017 12:38, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> +void qio_channel_detach_aio_context(QIOChannel *ioc)
> >> +{
> >> + ioc->read_coroutine = NULL;
> >> + ioc->write_coroutine = NULL;
> >> + qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handlers(ioc);
> >> + ioc->ctx = NULL;
> >
> > Why is qio_channel_set_aio_fd_handler not needed here?
>
> Because there are no read_coroutine and write_coroutine anymore. The
> caller needs to schedule them on the right AioContext after calling
> qio_channel_set_aio_context. See nbd_client_attach_aio_context in the
> next patch for an example.
>
> >> -tests/test-char$(EXESUF): tests/test-char.o qemu-char.o qemu-timer.o
> >> $(test-util-obj-y) $(qtest-obj-y) $(test-io-obj-y)
> >> +tests/test-char$(EXESUF): tests/test-char.o qemu-char.o qemu-timer.o
> >> $(test-util-obj-y) $(qtest-obj-y) $(test-io-obj-y) $(test-block-obj-y)
> >
> > I guess this is a hint for moving coroutine code into a lower level library
> > like
> > util.
>
> Coroutine, or AioContext? The reason for this is that io/ now uses
> aio_co_wake.
Or both. It just feels a bit odd to see *char* depend on *block*, maybe there're
more such dependencies to come even outside tests/?
Not necessarily for this series, of course.
Fam
