On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote: > Am 30.09.2010 21:37, schrieb Blue Swirl: >> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Stefan Weil<w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote: >> >>> >>> TARGET_FMT_lx is not allowed here, so use type casts to unsigned >>> (which should be large enough to hold typical nvram addresses). >>> >> >> The correct format is TARGET_FMT_plx. >> > > > addr is typically less than 8192 (size of nvram). > > TARGET_FMT_plx displays addr using 16 hex characters > when the target has 64 bit addresses. That's correct but > does not look pretty. > > Do you prefer TARGET_FMT_plx nevertheless?
We could also introduce a new format which does not perform zero padding.