On 02/18/2017 02:43 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
To fix the following warnings:

In file included from /users/pranith/qemu/tcg/tcg.c:255:
/users/pranith/qemu/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c:879:24: warning: implicit 
conversion from enumeration type 'TCGMemOp' (aka 'enum TCGMemOp') to different 
enumeration type 'TCGType' (aka 'enum TCGType')
      [-Wenum-conversion]
        tcg_out_cmp(s, ext, a, b, b_const);
        ~~~~~~~~~~~    ^~~
/users/pranith/qemu/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c:893:36: warning: implicit 
conversion from enumeration type 'TCGMemOp' (aka 'enum TCGMemOp') to different 
enumeration type 'TCGType' (aka 'enum TCGType')
      [-Wenum-conversion]
        tcg_out_insn(s, 3201, CBZ, ext, a, offset);
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/users/pranith/qemu/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c:389:65: note: expanded from 
macro 'tcg_out_insn'
    glue(tcg_out_insn_,FMT)(S, glue(glue(glue(I,FMT),_),OP), ## __VA_ARGS__)
                                                                ^
/users/pranith/qemu/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c:895:37: warning: implicit 
conversion from enumeration type 'TCGMemOp' (aka 'enum TCGMemOp') to different 
enumeration type 'TCGType' (aka 'enum TCGType')
      [-Wenum-conversion]
        tcg_out_insn(s, 3201, CBNZ, ext, a, offset);
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/users/pranith/qemu/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c:389:65: note: expanded from 
macro 'tcg_out_insn'
    glue(tcg_out_insn_,FMT)(S, glue(glue(glue(I,FMT),_),OP), ## __VA_ARGS__)
                                                                ^
/users/pranith/qemu/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c:1610:27: warning: implicit 
conversion from enumeration type 'TCGType' (aka 'enum TCGType') to different 
enumeration type 'TCGMemOp' (aka 'enum TCGMemOp')
      [-Wenum-conversion]
        tcg_out_brcond(s, ext, a2, a0, a1, const_args[1], arg_label(args[3]));
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ^~~

Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com>
---
 tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.inc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I haven't seen this, but I've also just noticed that the gcc farm aarch64 machine is using gcc 4.8.5, so that could be it.

Applied.


r~

Reply via email to