On 24 February 2017 at 20:25, BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Dropping the requirement for a base addr is not really the same >> change as adding the PCI device. > > > This is needed for PCI device because the base is not accessible before > something maps the BARs of the device so I had to use something else that is > known. So this change is part of making it a PCI device but I could make > this a separate patch if you think that's better. Should I split it off or > can leave it here?
I would split it off. thanks -- PMM
