Hi Alex,

On 03/02/2017 08:53 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> While I was debugging the icount issues I realised a bunch of the
> messages look quite similar. I've fixed this by including __func__ in
> the debug print. At the same time I move the a modern if (GATE) style
> printf which ensures the compiler can check for format string errors
> even if the code gets optimised away in the non-DEBUG_GIC case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> index 8e5a9d8a3e..b305d9032a 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> @@ -26,15 +26,20 @@
>  #include "qemu/log.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
>  
> -//#define DEBUG_GIC
> +/* #define DEBUG_GIC */
>  
>  #ifdef DEBUG_GIC
> -#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
> -do { fprintf(stderr, "arm_gic: " fmt , ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
> +#define DEBUG_GIC_GATE 1
>  #else
> -#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) do {} while(0)
> +#define DEBUG_GIC_GATE 0
>  #endif
>  
> +#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) do {                                          \
> +        if (DEBUG_GIC_GATE) {                                           \
> +            fprintf(stderr, "%s: " fmt, __func__, ## __VA_ARGS__);      \
> +        }                                                               \
> +    } while (0)
> +

Seems a prefered way is using qemu_log instead of fprintf?

Thanks,
Fred

>  static const uint8_t gic_id_11mpcore[] = {
>      0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x90, 0x13, 0x04, 0x00, 0x0d, 0xf0, 0x05, 0xb1
>  };
> 


Reply via email to