On 20 March 2017 at 16:29, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> I have some comments which feel kind of nit-picky, but since this >> is a public-facing HMP API I think they need attention since we only >> get one chance to get it right. > > HMP is not a stable interface. If we get it wrong, we change it. If > our change breaks your usage, you get to keep the pieces.
Oh yes, I had my HMP and QMP the wrong way round. ...which reminds me that I thought we preferred all HMP commands to be implemented in terms of their QMP equivalent ? thanks -- PMM
