On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:56:06AM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:54:53AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> writes: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 08:58:28PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > >> Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: > > >> > > >> > Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> writes: > > >> > > > >> >> On 27.03.2017 18:10, Max Reitz wrote: > > >> >>> On 27.03.2017 15:26, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > >> >>>> qemu_rbd_open() neglects to check pool and image are present. > > >> >>>> Reproducer: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -drive > > >> >>>> if=none,driver=rbd,pool=p > > >> >>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > >> >>>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -drive > > >> >>>> if=none,driver=rbd,image=i > > >> >>>> qemu-system-x86_64: -drive if=none,driver=rbd,image=i: error > > >> >>>> opening pool (null) > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Doesn't affect -drive with file=..., because > > >> >>>> qemu_rbd_parse_filename() > > >> >>>> always sets both pool and image. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Doesn't affect -blockdev, because pool and image are mandatory in > > >> >>>> the > > >> >>>> QAPI schema. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Fix by adding the missing checks. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> > > >> >>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > > >> >>>> --- > > >> >>>> block/rbd.c | 10 +++++++--- > > >> >>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > > >> >> > > >> >> That said, don't we have a similar issue with qemu_rbd_create()? It > > >> >> too > > >> >> doesn't check whether those options are given but I guess they're just > > >> >> as mandatory. > > >> > > > >> > Looks like it. I'll try to stick a fix into v4. > > >> > > >> Hmm, ignorant question: how can I reach qemu_rbd_create() without going > > >> through qemu_rbd_parse_filename()? > > > > > > You can't -- commit c7cacb3e7 forces qemu_rbd_create() to call > > > qemu_rbd_parse_filename(). And in qemu_rbd_parse_filename(), it will > > > complain if pool is not provided (and that is what causes the abort, not > > > the > > > missing image parameter). So I think we are safe, but a nicer error > > > message > > > for a missing 'image' parameter might be nice anyway. > > > > I now see the "we are safe" part, but not the "want a nicer error > > message for a missing 'image'" part. How can 'image' be missing? > > > > qemu_rbd_parse_filename() parses a pseudo-filename of the form > > > > rbd:POOL/IMAGE[@SNAP][:KEY=VALUE:...] > > > > It fails if > > > > * the pseudo-filename doesn't start with "rbd:" > > > > * doesn't contain '/' ("Pool name is required") > > > > * POOL, IMAGE, SNAP, the KEY=VALUE:... part or any KEY in it is empty or > > too long (until the next commit) > > > > * a KEY=VALUE doesn't contain '=' > > > > If it succeeds, "pool" and "image" are both set in @options. > > > > Can you give me a reproducer for the error message you'd like me to > > improve? > > > Sure: qemu-img info rbd:mypool/:mon_host=192.168.15.180 > > 'image' is technically present in the options, but it is an empty string. > > My thought was that it'd be nice to throw a similar error message for an > empty string for 'image'. As it is, the rbd library catches it, so it isn't > catastrophic, but a nicer message would be helpful. > > (My comment here assumes an empty string is not an acceptable image name for > rbd)
I'm not concerned enough by this to want a v5. I wasn't clear about that. -Jeff