Am 04.04.2017 um 15:27 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 15:19:02 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 03.04.2017 um 14:51 hat Peter Krempa geschrieben: > > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:15:42 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > > Am 31.03.2017 um 19:43 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > > > > > On 31.03.2017 18:03, Ciprian Barbu wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Peter, Eric, what is the status on the libvirt side here? > > > > > > Libvirt currently uses the NBD server only for non-shared storage > > > migration. At that point the disk is not shared (while qemu may think > > > so) since the other side is not actually running until the mirror > > > reaches synchronized state. > > > > Yes, I misunderstood the situation at first. > > > > Anyway, is there already a libvirt patch for the cases where the image > > is actually shared? > > As said, we use the nbd server only for migration. There's no other > usage I know of and thus no patch.
I mean two VMs sharing the same image file, and both expose it as a guest device. The situation for which we discussed before that libvirt needs to pass share-rw=on. I understand that this isn't related to this report, but I want to make sure that it's not forgotten. Kevin
pgpGVNhD3iTqq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
