On 04/05/2017 02:20 PM, John Snow wrote: > Conceptually straightforward. > > looks like this might change behavior for... RBD and vvfat, right? > RBD is the subject of this series so we'll just assume that was broken > and stupid. > > What's vvfat's story? It always set the read-only property to false > regardless of what you asked for?
vvfat is even stupider than that - it has its own independent property 'rw' that determines whether to allow write operations, separate from the inherited BDS readonly property. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
