On 03/23/2017 01:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
What was the bad design that required you to fix the previous test? :)
> ---
> blockjob.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/blockjob.c b/blockjob.c
> index c9cb5b1..093962b 100644
> --- a/blockjob.c
> +++ b/blockjob.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,12 @@ static void block_job_completed_single(BlockJob *job)
> block_job_unref(job);
> }
>
> +static void block_job_cancel_async(BlockJob *job)
> +{
> + job->cancelled = true;
> + block_job_iostatus_reset(job);
> +}
> +
> static void block_job_completed_txn_abort(BlockJob *job)
> {
> AioContext *ctx;
> @@ -397,7 +403,7 @@ static void block_job_completed_txn_abort(BlockJob *job)
> * them; this job, however, may or may not be cancelled,
> depending
> * on the caller, so leave it. */
> if (other_job != job) {
> - other_job->cancelled = true;
> + block_job_cancel_async(other_job);
Adds an ioreset here, which I think is probably fine...
> }
> continue;
> }
> @@ -489,8 +495,7 @@ void block_job_user_resume(BlockJob *job)
> void block_job_cancel(BlockJob *job)
> {
> if (block_job_started(job)) {
> - job->cancelled = true;
> - block_job_iostatus_reset(job);
> + block_job_cancel_async(job);
> block_job_enter(job);
> } else {
> block_job_completed(job, -ECANCELED);
>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
