On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 04/12/2017 10:15 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > Recent commits that re-organized ICPState object missed to destroy > > the object when CPU is unrealized. Fix this so that CPU unplug > > doesn't abort QEMU. > > Indeed. > > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > I am wondering if we should not be doing the unparent under > spapr_cpu_destroy() or even xics_cpu_destroy(). Apart from > that,
Thought so, but since object is created in realize routinte itself (and not in any of its callers), did the object destruction in unrealize to be symmetrical :) Regards, Bharata.
