On 05/08/2017 01:41 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 08.05.2017 19:13, Eric Blake wrote:
>> When converting a 1.1 image down to 0.10, qemu-iotests 060 forces
>> a contrived failure where allocating a cluster used to replace a
>> zero cluster reads unaligned data.  Since it is a zero cluster
>> rather than a data cluster being converted, changing the error
>> message to match our earlier change in 'qcow2: Make distinction
>> bewteen zero cluster types obvious' is worthwhile.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> There's one more instance of "Data cluster offset" in qcow2-cluster.c,
>> but that one in handle_copied() is contained inside a
>> cluster_type == QCOW2_CLUSTER_NORMAL conditional.
>>
>>  block/qcow2-cluster.c      | 3 ++-
>>  tests/qemu-iotests/060.out | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks good, except for one thing: This is for qemu-img amend, not
> qemu-img convert.
> 
> I can handle that, if you'd like, though. :-)

So is fixing my commit message considered a conversion, or an amendment?

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to