On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:31:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年05月10日 16:01, Peter Xu wrote:
> >Hardware support for VT-d device passthrough. Although current Linux can
> >live with iommu=pt even without this, but this is faster than when using
> >software passthrough.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> >---
> > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 210
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 1 +
> > hw/i386/trace-events | 2 +
> > hw/i386/x86-iommu.c | 1 +
> > include/hw/i386/x86-iommu.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> >index 1a7eba2..1d034f9 100644
> >--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> >+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> >@@ -640,6 +640,29 @@ static bool vtd_slpte_nonzero_rsvd(uint64_t slpte,
> >uint32_t level)
> > }
> > }
> >+/* Find the VTD address space associated with a given bus number */
> >+static VTDBus *vtd_find_as_from_bus_num(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint8_t bus_num)
> >+{
> >+ VTDBus *vtd_bus = s->vtd_as_by_bus_num[bus_num];
> >+ if (!vtd_bus) {
> >+ /*
> >+ * Iterate over the registered buses to find the one which
> >+ * currently hold this bus number, and update the bus_num
> >+ * lookup table:
> >+ */
> >+ GHashTableIter iter;
> >+
> >+ g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, s->vtd_as_by_busptr);
> >+ while (g_hash_table_iter_next (&iter, NULL, (void**)&vtd_bus)) {
> >+ if (pci_bus_num(vtd_bus->bus) == bus_num) {
> >+ s->vtd_as_by_bus_num[bus_num] = vtd_bus;
> >+ return vtd_bus;
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ }
> >+ return vtd_bus;
> >+}
> >+
> > /* Given the @iova, get relevant @slptep. @slpte_level will be the last
> > level
> > * of the translation, can be used for deciding the size of large page.
> > */
> >@@ -881,6 +904,11 @@ static int vtd_dev_to_context_entry(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> >uint8_t bus_num,
> > type_fail = true;
> > }
> > break;
> >+ case VTD_CONTEXT_TT_PASS_THROUGH:
> >+ if (!x86_iommu->pt_supported) {
> >+ type_fail = true;
> >+ }
> >+ break;
> > default:
> > /* Unknwon type */
> > type_fail = true;
> >@@ -894,6 +922,84 @@ static int vtd_dev_to_context_entry(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> >uint8_t bus_num,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >+/*
> >+ * Fetch translation type for specific device. Returns <0 if error
> >+ * happens, otherwise return the shifted type to check against
> >+ * VTD_CONTEXT_TT_*.
> >+ */
> >+static int vtd_dev_get_trans_type(VTDAddressSpace *as)
> >+{
> >+ IntelIOMMUState *s;
> >+ VTDContextEntry ce;
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ s = as->iommu_state;
> >+
> >+ ret = vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(as->bus),
> >+ as->devfn, &ce);
> >+ if (ret) {
> >+ return ret;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ return vtd_ce_get_type(&ce);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static bool vtd_dev_pt_enabled(VTDAddressSpace *as)
> >+{
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ assert(as);
> >+
> >+ ret = vtd_dev_get_trans_type(as);
> >+ if (ret < 0) {
> >+ /*
> >+ * Possibly failed to parse the context entry for some reason
> >+ * (e.g., during init, or any guest configuration errors on
> >+ * context entries). We should assume PT not enabled for
> >+ * safety.
> >+ */
> >+ return false;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ return ret == VTD_CONTEXT_TT_PASS_THROUGH;
> >+}
> >+
> >+/*
> >+ * When we are during init phase (device realizations, global
> >+ * enable/disable of translations), we should not detect PT
> >+ * (passthrough) when switching address spaces. In that cases, we
> >+ * should set `detect_pt' to false.
> >+ *
> >+ * Return whether the device is using IOMMU translation.
> >+ */
> >+static bool vtd_switch_address_space(VTDAddressSpace *as, bool detect_pt)
> >+{
>
> The detect_pt looks suspicious. E.g if the context entry does not exist,
> vtd_dev_pt_enabled() will return false.
I forgot why I added that even after reading the comments I wrote. I
blame too much context switches recently in my brain. :(
(this is an excuse of mine :)
I did some test and I see nothing wrong to not hack on this bit. I
will remove that in next version, until one day I remembered
something.
And I will try to add more detailed comments in the future.
>
> >+ bool use_iommu;
> >+
> >+ assert(as);
> >+
> >+ use_iommu = as->iommu_state->dmar_enabled;
> >+ if (detect_pt) {
> >+ use_iommu &= !vtd_dev_pt_enabled(as);
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ trace_vtd_switch_address_space(pci_bus_num(as->bus),
> >+ VTD_PCI_SLOT(as->devfn),
> >+ VTD_PCI_FUNC(as->devfn),
> >+ use_iommu);
> >+
> >+ /* Turn off first then on the other */
> >+ if (use_iommu) {
> >+ memory_region_set_enabled(&as->sys_alias, false);
> >+ memory_region_set_enabled(&as->iommu, true);
> >+ } else {
> >+ memory_region_set_enabled(&as->iommu, false);
> >+ memory_region_set_enabled(&as->sys_alias, true);
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ return use_iommu;
> >+}
> >+
> > static inline uint16_t vtd_make_source_id(uint8_t bus_num, uint8_t devfn)
> > {
> > return ((bus_num & 0xffUL) << 8) | (devfn & 0xffUL);
> >@@ -931,6 +1037,31 @@ static inline bool vtd_is_interrupt_addr(hwaddr addr)
> > return VTD_INTERRUPT_ADDR_FIRST <= addr && addr <=
> > VTD_INTERRUPT_ADDR_LAST;
> > }
> >+static void vtd_pt_enable_fast_path(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint16_t source_id)
> >+{
> >+ VTDBus *vtd_bus;
> >+ VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
> >+ const char *msg = "FAIL";
> >+
> >+ vtd_bus = vtd_find_as_from_bus_num(s, VTD_SID_TO_BUS(source_id));
> >+ if (!vtd_bus) {
> >+ goto out;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ vtd_as = vtd_bus->dev_as[VTD_SID_TO_DEVFN(source_id)];
> >+ if (!vtd_as) {
> >+ goto out;
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ if (vtd_switch_address_space(vtd_as, true) == false) {
> >+ /* We switched off IOMMU region successfully. */
> >+ msg = "SUCCESS";
> >+ }
> >+
> >+out:
> >+ trace_vtd_pt_enable_fast_path(source_id, msg);
>
> Looks like using a boolean is better here.
Sure.
>
> >+}
> >+
> > /* Map dev to context-entry then do a paging-structures walk to do a iommu
> > * translation.
> > *
> >@@ -1002,6 +1133,30 @@ static void vtd_do_iommu_translate(VTDAddressSpace
> >*vtd_as, PCIBus *bus,
> > cc_entry->context_cache_gen = s->context_cache_gen;
> > }
> >+ /*
> >+ * We don't need to translate for pass-through context entries.
> >+ * Also, let's ignore IOTLB caching as well for PT devices.
> >+ */
> >+ if (vtd_ce_get_type(&ce) == VTD_CONTEXT_TT_PASS_THROUGH) {
> >+ entry->translated_addr = entry->iova;
> >+ entry->addr_mask = VTD_PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> >+ entry->perm = IOMMU_RW;
> >+ trace_vtd_translate_pt(source_id, entry->iova);
> >+
> >+ /*
> >+ * When this happens, it means firstly caching-mode is not
> >+ * enabled, and this is the first passthrough translation for
> >+ * the device. Let's enable the fast path for passthrough.
> >+ *
> >+ * When passthrough is disabled again for the device, we can
> >+ * capture it via the context entry invalidation, then the
> >+ * IOMMU region can be swapped back.
> >+ */
> >+ vtd_pt_enable_fast_path(s, source_id);
> >+
> >+ return;
> >+ }
> >+
> > ret_fr = vtd_iova_to_slpte(&ce, addr, is_write, &slpte, &level,
> > &reads, &writes);
> > if (ret_fr) {
> >@@ -1081,29 +1236,6 @@ static void
> >vtd_context_global_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> > vtd_iommu_replay_all(s);
> > }
> >-
> >-/* Find the VTD address space currently associated with a given bus number,
> >- */
> >-static VTDBus *vtd_find_as_from_bus_num(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint8_t bus_num)
> >-{
> >- VTDBus *vtd_bus = s->vtd_as_by_bus_num[bus_num];
> >- if (!vtd_bus) {
> >- /* Iterate over the registered buses to find the one
> >- * which currently hold this bus number, and update the bus_num
> >lookup table:
> >- */
> >- GHashTableIter iter;
> >-
> >- g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, s->vtd_as_by_busptr);
> >- while (g_hash_table_iter_next (&iter, NULL, (void**)&vtd_bus)) {
> >- if (pci_bus_num(vtd_bus->bus) == bus_num) {
> >- s->vtd_as_by_bus_num[bus_num] = vtd_bus;
> >- return vtd_bus;
> >- }
> >- }
> >- }
> >- return vtd_bus;
> >-}
> >-
> > /* Do a context-cache device-selective invalidation.
> > * @func_mask: FM field after shifting
> > */
> >@@ -1146,6 +1278,11 @@ static void
> >vtd_context_device_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> > VTD_PCI_FUNC(devfn_it));
> > vtd_as->context_cache_entry.context_cache_gen = 0;
> > /*
> >+ * Do switch address space when needed, in case if the
> >+ * device passthrough bit is switched.
> >+ */
> >+ vtd_switch_address_space(vtd_as, true);
>
> Do we need to do this also in DSI and GLOBAL invalidation?
Yes. Though this should be optional at least for Linux, but I will add
that later.
Thanks!
--
Peter Xu
