On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:11:27PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > >>> + int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads(); > >>> + int nr_servers = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads); > >> > >> may be we should reintroduce nr_servers at the machine level ? > >> > > > > I had reintroduced it but then I realized it was only used in this > > function. > > nr_servers is also used when the device tree is populated with the > interrupt controller nodes. No big deal.
Which is guest visible, so we should really make that stay the same
for older machine types. I'd like to avoid re-introducing nr_servers
as a property if we can, but maybe we can't.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
