On 05/18/2017 09:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: Not sure why I included a trailing dot in the subject line; a maintainer can remove that if desired.
> The lone caller that cares about a return of BDRV_BLOCK_RAW > completely replaces the return value, so there is no point in > passing BDRV_BLOCK_DATA. For that matter, I could have mentioned that the lone caller is io.c:bdrv_co_get_block_status(). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > --- -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
