On 02/06/2017 14:24, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 April 2017 at 20:18, Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Tested and confirmed that the stretch i386 debian qcow2 image on a >> raspberry pi 2 works. >> >> Fixes: LP#: 893208 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/893208/> >> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com> >> --- >> include/qemu/timer.h | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h >> index 8a1eb74839..1b518bca30 100644 >> --- a/include/qemu/timer.h >> +++ b/include/qemu/timer.h >> @@ -1020,10 +1020,9 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) >> /* The host CPU doesn't have an easily accessible cycle counter. >> Just return a monotonically increasing value. This will be >> totally wrong, but hopefully better than nothing. */ >> -static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks (void) >> +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) >> { >> - static int64_t ticks = 0; >> - return ticks++; >> + return get_clock(); >> } >> #endif > > Hmm, it looks like this patch got lost. Paolo, did you want to > give it a reviewed-by? From the discussion on v1 it sounded > like you had the best grip on the timer code ;-)
Sure: Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > (Does the comment on the function need updating ?) Apart from "totally", it's still pretty correct. :) Thanks, Paolo
