Hi On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:22 AM Valluri, Amarnath < amarnath.vall...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 14:34 +0000, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:00 PM Amarnath Valluri < > amarnath.vall...@intel.com> wrote: > > TPMDriverOps inside TPMBackend is not required, as it is supposed to be a > class > member. The only possible reason for keeping in TPMBackend was, to get the > backend type in tpm.c where dedicated backend api, tpm_backend_get_type() > is > present. > > Signed-off-by: Amarnath Valluri <amarnath.vall...@intel.com> > > > Please add & keep my r-b tags from previous iterations in commit message > if they are no or only minor changes. > > Marc, do you mean to resend the patch set by keeping 'Reviewed-by:' tag > for commits. > On the patches I gave a "Reviewed-by", you should add it to the commit message. Next resend of the series should have them. -- Marc-André Lureau