On 07/25/2017 03:24 AM, Lluís Vilanova wrote: > Eric Blake writes: > >> On 07/24/2017 12:46 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova <vilan...@ac.upc.edu> >>> --- >>> instrument/Makefile.objs | 1 + >>> instrument/qmp.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> qapi-schema.json | 3 ++ >>> qapi/instrument.json | 92 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 4 files changed, 167 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 instrument/qmp.c >>> create mode 100644 qapi/instrument.json > >> Adding new files; but I don't see a patch to MAINTAINERS to cover >> instrument/*. > > Who should I put as a maintainer? Or does this go to the general > maintainer(s)?
You can be the maintainer if you'd like; or see if Stefan is okay including it as part of the trace files, since it trace-related. >>> +## >>> +{ 'command': 'instr-load', >>> + 'data': { 'path': 'str', '*args': ['String'] }, > >> Why are you double-nesting things? It's a lot nicer to use ['str'] > Aha, you mean the definition should be this instead? > > { 'command': 'instr-load', > 'data': { 'path': 'str', '*args': ['str'] }, > 'returns': 'InstrLoadResult' } Yes. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature