On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:16:54 +0200 David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 25.07.2017 13:55, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:56:03 +0200 > > David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Based on series: > >> "[PATCH v2 0/5] target/s390x: cpu model cleanups + improvements" > > > > I'm trying to decide what to do with this series; probably nothing for > > 2.10. > > > >> > >> 1. smaller pgm irq instruction length fixes > > > > These, I would have considered. But it seems Richard had an alternative > > idea which is 2.11 material. So I'll probably just ignore these for now. > > I'd suggest to simply pick these two up. Simple fixes. Richards series > is a step into the right direction, getting rid of explicit ILEN > specification/ILEN_AUTO completely, avoiding such bugs in the future. These two are certainly small enough. > > But I'll let Richard + you decide. > > > > >> 2. implement IPM, which is often used in context of MSA instructions > >> 3. implement all basic MSA (cpacf/crypto) instructions <= z13. Only provide > >> the query subfunction (to query available subfunctions), no actual > >> de/encryption yet > > > > This is certainly 2.11 material. > > We could discuss if IPM makes sense. I can resend the updated version. As we're suppose to enter (or have entered) hardfreeze now, I'd prefer to defer to 2.11. > MSA can certainly wait for 2.11.
