On Sun, 07/30 19:23, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 July 2017 at 17:51, Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> wrote: > > On 29.07.2017 21:34, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 29 July 2017 at 14:50, Patrick Steinhardt <p...@pks.im> wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:20:49PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >>>> This is likely to break on BSD, but now than patchew has a NetBSD job > >>>> you can trigger a build RESENDing this patch. > >> > > > > I just checked patchew, and there is FreeBSD job. How far are we from > > adding more BSDs? > > I now test OpenBSD and NetBSD as well in my pre-merge > test setup. Patchew could add them as well if desired. > (vm setup instructions at http://wiki.qemu.org/Hosts/BSD)
No objection to adding more BSDs to patchew as long as I can find a few more gigabytes RAM to run the VM (BTW I'm also thinking about converting long running VMs to boot/shutdown on demand, to support more types of guests). But still want to ask this: how likely it is for a patch to compile on one BSD flavor but fail on the other? Fam
